The Sociology of Language, Newbury House, Rowley, MA. Readings in the Sociology of Language, Mouton, The Hague. Hymes (eds.),ĭirections in Sociolinguistics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 407–434.ĭictionary of American Regional English Voume 1: Introduction and A‐C, Belknap, Cambridge, MA. and Gumperz, J.J.: 1972, ‘Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code‐switching in Norway’, in J.J. and Cutler, C.: 2003, ‘AAE and variation in teachers attitudes: A question of school philosophy’, This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Ĭlass, Codes and Control, Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd., Boston, MA.īlake, R. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Hence, three areas of sociolinguistic investigation are delineated: The dictionary, however, adds a third possibility, namely, an ethnomethodological orientation. Trauth and Kazzazi ( 1996) in the Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics make a similar distinction, noting that sociolinguistics can have either a sociological or linguistic orientation. Whereas sociolinguistics takes linguistic factors as primary in its investigations of language and society, the sociology of language investigates the manner in which social and political forces influence language use. As evidence of this debate, Wardhaugh ( 1992) and others make a distinction between sociolinguistics and the sociology of language. One of the major debates in the field of sociolinguistics is whether to take social or linguistic factors as primary in investigating this relationship. Sociolinguistics is concerned with the relationship between language use and social variables.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |